Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)

* Josh Berkus (josh@agliodbs.com) wrote:
> Well, if that's the alternative, I'd vote for taking it.  For me,
> personally, I think the usefulness of it would outstrip the number of
> functions I'd have to debug.

Agreed.  Having it take an interval makes a whole lot more sense than
backing a decision that it should take a string-cast-to-integer.
Thanks,
    Stephen