Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-07-24 11:53:39 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Andres Freund wrote:
> > Amusingly, this will mean ForgetBackgroundWorker() will need to have a
> > slist_mutable_iter * argument if it wants to use the new function ...
>
> The only alternative I see would be to pass both the prev, and the cur
> elements which seems to be less expressive from my POV.
> I am open to other suggestions?
In the grand scheme of things, I think it's fine.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services