Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> In general, I find these new wordings to be a loss of clarity. There is
> no indication on the SELECT man page or in the documentation index what
> a "row-level lock" is at all.
>
> I would suggest that these changes be undone, except that the old
> "SELECT FOR ..." be replaced by a dynamic string that reverse-parses the
> LockingClause to provide the actual clause that was used.
Hmm, that's an idea. If there are no objections, I'll get this fixed.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services