Re: SSL renegotiation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Noah Misch
Тема Re: SSL renegotiation
Дата
Msg-id 20130713005152.GA1219036@tornado.leadboat.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SSL renegotiation  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: SSL renegotiation  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: SSL renegotiation  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Now, should we support the 0.9.6-and-earlier mechanism?  My inclination
> is no; even RHEL 3, the oldest supported Linux distribution, uses 0.9.7
> (Heck, even Red Hat Linux 9, released on 2003).  To see OpenSSL 0.9.6
> you need to go back to Red Hat Linux 7.2, released on 2001 using a Linux
> kernel 2.4.  Surely no one in their right mind would use a current
> Postgres release on such an ancient animal.

Agreed.  The OpenSSL Project last applied a security fix to 0.9.6 over eight
years ago.  Compatibility with 0.9.6 has zero or negative value.

-- 
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB                                 http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Wong
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [Review] Add SPI_gettypmod() to return a field's typemod from a TupleDesc / audit of [E] TODO items
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: --with-libedit-preferred is bad design