On 2013-06-28 14:01:23 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Per discussion on these tests, I ran "make check" against 9.4 head,
> applied all of the regression tests other than DISCARD.
>
> Time for 3 "make check" runs without new tests: 65.9s
>
> Time for 3 "make check runs with new tests: 71.7s
>
> So that's an increase of about 10% in test runtime (or 2 seconds per run
> on my laptop), in order to greatly improve regression test coverage.
How did you evaluate that coverage increased "greatly"? I am not
generally against these tests but I'd be surprised if the overall test
coverage improved noticeably by this. Which makes 10% runtime overhead
pretty hefty if the goal is to actually achieve a high coverage.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services