Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
Дата
Msg-id 20130627010810.GA5069@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на SMH on Salesforce-Oracle  (Ned Lilly <ned@xtuple.com>)
Ответы Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
Список pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 06:38:04PM -0400, Ned Lilly wrote:
> Anyone have any insight into what's going on with this
> Salesforce-Oracle love connection?  Seems kind of odd to hire Tom
> and a bunch of other guys, then announce a 9-year commitment to
> Oracle a few weeks later....

Well, logic suggests that Salesforce was considering moving to Postgres
but, either because they got a good deal from Oracle or they were just
bluffing about moving to Postgres, they are no longer considering it.
The size, scope, publicity, and duration of the deal support this
conclusion:

    http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/1964798

The press release specifically mentions Oracle Database.

Of course, there might be some other conclusion, logical or illogical,
but I can't think of one.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Leif Biberg Kristensen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
Следующее
От: comcast
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle