* Atri Sharma (atri.jiit@gmail.com) wrote:
> Right, let me look.Although, I am pretty busy atm with ordered set
> functions, so will get it done maybe last week of this month.
Isn't it currently the last week of this month? :) I'm guessing you
mean July.
> Another thing I believe in is that we should have multiple hashing
> functions for bloom filters, which generate different probability
> values so that the coverage is good.
I really don't see that happening, to be honest.. I think it would be
interesting to try some of the surrogate-additional-hashing that I
described.
Thanks,
Stephen