* Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 2013-06-12 07:53:29 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >> The attached patch fixes this problem. It just changes walsender so that it
> >> waits for all the outstanding WAL records to be replicated to the standby
> >> before closing the replication connection.
> >
> > Imo this is a fix that needs to get backpatched... The code tried to do
> > this but failed, I don't think it really gives grounds for valid *new*
> > concerns.
>
> +1 (without having looked at the code itself, it's definitely a
> behaviour that needs to be fixed)
Yea, I was also thinking it would be reasonable to backpatch this; it
really looks like a bug that we're allowing this to happen today.
So, +1 on a backpatch for me. I've looked at the patch (it's a
one-liner, plus some additional comments) but havn't looked through the
overall code surrounding it.
Thanks,
Stephen