On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:26:52PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Monday, May 13, 2013 7:59 PM Noah Misch wrote:
> > We can allocate a small amount of permanent shared memory for
> > coordination
> > among a group of processes, but sorting will benefit from a region as
> > large as
> > maintenance_work_mem. Expect on-demand memory sharing.
>
> Will the shared memory used for coordinating tuples between master and
> worker be fixed or varying depending on size of tuples to be sorted or
> number of workers associated.
> If it is varying, then it can sometimes encounter situation where required
> memory is not available and in that case it has to revert to serial sorting
> How will the parallel sorting tasks be divided and assigned to each worker?
I haven't selected answers for those details, yet.
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com