Re: Jeff Janes 2013-04-06 <CAMkU=1zvioQvMgbWssHv3DnXMNeEJmqtq_5hJqLGx8i4eGAQJg@mail.gmail.com>
> I don't think the docs are very clear on that. They say "This file will of
> course be archived as a part of your backup dump file", but "will be" does
> not imply "must be". Elsewhere it emphasizes that the label you gave to
> pg_start_backup is written into the file, but doesn't really say what the
> file itself is there for. To me it seems to imply that the file is there
> for your convenience, to hold that label, and not as a critical part of the
> system.
This was also my impression, tbh :-/. And the problem just popped up
again independently on #postgresql.
> Patch attached, which I hope can be back-patched. I'll also add it to
> commitfest-Next.
+1. It makes the documentation clearer on this.
Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/