Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

On 2013-03-28 10:18:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> Since we call relation_open() with lockmode, ISTM that we should also call
> > relation_close() with the same lockmode instead of NoLock. No?
> >
> Agreed on that.

That doesn't really hold true generally, its often sensible to hold the
lock till the end of the transaction, which is what not specifying a
lock at close implies.

Greetings,

Andres Freund