Re: Time for an autoconf update

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 02/08/2013 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >Over in Fedora-land they're trying to institute support for ARM64,
> >which among other things means autoconf 2.69 or later:
> >http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178273.html
>
> Is there any good reason not to move to whatever the latest and
> greatest is? 2.69 does seem pretty new - even Fedora 17 only comes
> with 2.68.

Considering that only a handful of people need the specific required
autoconf version, I don't think it's a problem to migrate to the latest
and greatest.

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services