Phil Sorber escribió:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Maybe. But I'm not inclined to add new libpq interface at this stage.
> > Because we are in the last CommitFest and I'm not sure whether
> > we have enough time to implement that. Instead, how about using
> > both PQconninfoParse() and PQconndefaults() like uri-regress.c does?
> > Or just remove that output message? At least I don't think that the
> > information about host and port needs to be output. Which would make
> > the code very simpler.
>
> I think that output is important as do others up thread. I think it'd
> be simpler to just disable dbname's ability to double as conninfo. If
> we are looking for easy, that is.
>
> I don't mind duplicating the behavior from conninfo_array_parse() or
> uri-regress.c either. I can just put a comment that at some point in
> the future we should add a libpq interface for it.
I suggest duplicate the code for 9.3, and submit a patch to refactor
into a new libpq function for CF2013-next. If the patch is simple
enough, we can consider putting it into 9.3.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services