Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal
Дата
Msg-id 20130125203207.GO6848@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:29:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Oops, thanks.  Here is the right paragraph, same issue:
> 
> >     If successfully created, a named portal object lasts till the end of the
> >     current transaction, unless explicitly destroyed.  An unnamed portal is
> >     destroyed at the end of the transaction, or as soon as the next Bind
> >     statement specifying the unnamed portal as destination is issued.  (Note
> 
> What is the issue exactly?  Seems clear and correct to me ... but then,
> I think I wrote this text, a long time ago.

Tatsuo's complain was that on sentence said "named portal", while all
portals are closed on transaction end.  However, "unnamed portal" is
named in the next sentence, so it seems OK.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Enabling Checksums
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: setting per-database/role parameters checks them against wrong context