Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal
Дата
Msg-id 20130125182848.GE6848@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Oct  1, 2012 at 02:04:00PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> writes:
> >> From the manual:
> >> "An unnamed portal is destroyed at the end of the transaction"
> > 
> > Actually, all portals are destroyed at end of transaction (unless
> > they're from holdable cursors).  Named or not doesn't enter into it.
> 
> We need to fix the document then.

I looked into this.  The text reads:
If successfully created, a named prepared-statement object lasts tillthe end of the current session, unless explicitly
destroyed. An unnamedprepared statement lasts only until the next Parse statement specifyingthe unnamed statement as
destinationis issued.
 

While the first statement does say "named", the next sentence says
"unnamed", so I am not sure we can make this any clearer.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LATERAL, UNNEST and spec compliance