Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning
Дата
Msg-id 20130124220951.GD21914@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на COPY FREEZE has no warning  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:02:46PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> As a reminder, COPY FREEZE still does not issue any warning/notice if
> the freezing does not happen:
>
>       Requests copying the data with rows already frozen, just as they
>       would be after running the <command>VACUUM FREEZE</> command.
>       This is intended as a performance option for initial data loading.
>       Rows will be frozen only if the table being loaded has been created
>       in the current subtransaction, there are no cursors open and there
>       are no older snapshots held by this transaction. If those conditions
>       are not met the command will continue without error though will not
>       freeze rows. It is also possible in rare cases that the request
>       cannot be honoured for internal reasons, hence <literal>FREEZE</literal>
>       is more of a guideline than a hard rule.
>
>       Note that all other sessions will immediately be able to see the data
>       once it has been successfully loaded. This violates the normal rules
>       of MVCC visibility and by specifying this option the user acknowledges
>       explicitly that this is understood.
>
> Didn't we want to issue the user some kind of feedback?

As no one wanted to write this patch, I have developed the attached
version.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #6572: The example of SPI_execute is bogus