Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

Andres Freund escribió:

> I somewhat dislike the fact that CONCURRENTLY isn't really concurrent
> here (for the listeners: swapping the indexes acquires exlusive locks) ,
> but I don't see any other naming being better.

REINDEX ALMOST CONCURRENTLY?

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services