Re: [PATCH 1/2] Provide a common malloc wrappers and palloc et al. emulation for frontend'ish environs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: [PATCH 1/2] Provide a common malloc wrappers and palloc et al. emulation for frontend'ish environs
Дата
Msg-id 20130109151851.GC13084@awork2.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH 1/2] Provide a common malloc wrappers and palloc et al. emulation for frontend'ish environs  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2013-01-09 11:45:12 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> 
> How hard is the backend hit by palloc being now an additional function
> call?  Would it be a good idea to make it (and friends) STATIC_IF_INLINE?

Missed this at first...

I don't think there's any measurable hit now as there is no additional
function call as I chose to directly do the work directly in
palloc[0]. That causes a minor amount of code duplication but imo thats
ok. I didn't do that for pstrdup() but it would be easy enough to do it
there as well, but I don't think it matters there.

In a quick test I couldn't find any performance difference.

I don't think making them STATIC_IF_INLINE functions would help as I
think that would still require the CurrentMemoryContext symbol to be
visible in the callers context.

FWIW I previously measured whether the function call overhead via mcxt.c
is measurable and it wasn't...

Greetings,

Andres Freund

-- Andres Freund                       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make
Следующее
От: Christian Ullrich
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make