On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:10:31AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 7 January 2013 07:29, Takeshi Yamamuro
> <yamamuro.takeshi@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
> > Anyway, the compression speed in lz4 is very fast, so in my
> > opinion, there is a room to improve the current implementation
> > in pg_lzcompress.
>
> So why don't we use LZ4?
>
+1
Regards,
Ken