Re: enhanced error fields
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: enhanced error fields |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20121230020104.GH16126@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: enhanced error fields (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: enhanced error fields
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter,
* Peter Geoghegan (peter@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> In order for the problem you describe to happen, the user would have
> to ignore the warning in the documentation about constraint_name's
> ability to uniquely identify something, and then have two constraints
> in play at the same time with the same name but substantively
> different. That seems incredibly unlikely.
I really don't think what I sketched out or something similar would
happen. I do think it's incredibly frustrating as a user who is trying
to develop an application which behaves correctly to be given only half
the information.
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: