Re: enhanced error fields

* Pavel Stehule (pavel.stehule@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Having just constraint_schema and constraint_name feels horribly wrong
> > as the definition of a constraint also includes a pg_class oid.
>
> but then TABLE_NAME and TABLE_SCHEMA will be defined.

How are you going to look up the constraint?  Using constraint_schema,
table_name, and constraint_name?  Or table_schema, table_name and
constraint_name?  When do you use constraint_schema instead of
table_schema?

None of those options is exactly clear or understandable...
Thanks,
    Stephen