Re: Slow queries after vacuum analyze

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Slow queries after vacuum analyze
Дата
Msg-id 20121218200955.14720@gmx.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Slow queries after vacuum analyze  (Ghislain ROUVIGNAC <ghr@sylob.com>)
Ответы Re: Slow queries after vacuum analyze  (Ghislain ROUVIGNAC <ghr@sylob.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Ghislain ROUVIGNAC wrote:

> Memory : In use 4 Go, Free 15Go, cache 5 Go.

If the active portion of your database is actually small enough
that it fits in the OS cache, I recommend:

seq_page_cost = 0.1
random_page_cost = 0.1
cpu_tuple_cost = 0.05

> I plan to increase various parameters as follow:
> shared_buffers = 512MB
> temp_buffers = 16MB
> work_mem = 32MB
> wal_buffers = 16MB
> checkpoint_segments = 32
> effective_cache_size = 2560MB
> default_statistics_target = 500
> autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor = 0.05
> autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor = 0.025

You could probably go a little higher on work_mem and
effective_cache_size. I would leave default_statistics_target alone
unless you see a lot of estimates which are off by more than an
order of magnitude. Even then, it is often better to set a higher
value for a few individual columns than for everything. Remember
that this setting has no effect until you reload the configuration
and then VACUUM.

-Kevin


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vibhor Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: How can i find out top high load sql queries in PostgreSQL.
Следующее
От: Huan Ruan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: hash join vs nested loop join