Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1
Дата
Msg-id 20121218162608.GB24700@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] trouble with pg_upgrade 9.0 -> 9.1  (Groshev Andrey <greenx@yandex.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:28:00AM +0400, Groshev Andrey wrote:
> 
> 
> 18.12.2012, 05:22, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>:
> > This is the first pg_upgrade mismatch report we have gotten about 9.1.
> > I have asked the reporter for details.
> >
> > Is what is the full 9.1 version number?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> >>  # rpm -qa |grep postgres
> >>  postgresql90-devel-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql91-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql90-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql90-server-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql91-libs-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql91-server-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql91-devel-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql90-libs-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql90-contrib-9.0.11-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>  postgresql91-contrib-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64
> >>
> 
> Full version ? It is not full postgresql91-9.1.7-1PGDG.rhel6.x86_64 or I do not understand something?
> I installed latest postgresql from the repository http://yum.pgrpms.org

Oops, I see that now, sorry.  I wanted to make sure you were on the most
recent 9.1 version, and you are.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ADMIN] Problems with enums after pg_upgrade
Следующее
От: Ronan Dunklau
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables