On 2012-11-26 21:45:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > I gather that this is supposed to be back-patched to all supported
> > branches.
>
> FWIW, I don't like that patch any better than Robert does. It seems
> as likely to do harm as good. If there are places where libpq itself
> is leaving entries on the error stack, we should fix them -- retail.
> But it's not our business to clobber global state because there might
> be bugs in some other part of an application.
As there hasn't been any new input since this comment I am marking the
patch as "Rejected" in the CF application.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services