Re: Missing dists at apt.postgresql.org
| От | Christoph Berg |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Missing dists at apt.postgresql.org |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20121208140618.GA17909@msgid.df7cb.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Список | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Re: Nelson A. de Oliveira 2012-12-07 <CAARFvTXDJUaO5wPHN1_EqWQ=qn-qLLUoeUpfZ5VEvZdm7bU0xA@mail.gmail.com> > Hi Christoph! > > You said in your post that "The distributions are called codename-pgdg" > but there aren't a stable-pgdg, testing-pgdg nor unstable-pgdg in > http://apt.postgresql.org/pub/repos/apt/dists/ > > Shouldn't they also be available? (unstable-pgdg symlinked to sid-pgdg, > for example) > > It's common to use stable/testing/unstable in sources.list and it would > be good if this same behavior could also be used with postgresql's > repository. Well, it's "codename", not "suite". I was thinking about that when setting up the repository, but I'd prefer not to have to "release" something at our side when Debian releases, i.e. update the symlinks when the next stable release comes out. I couldn't do that at the very time as Debian anyway, so there would always be a time window where "stable" would be the wrong stable for some people. I'd also claim it is better style to use codenames in the sources.list anyway, because then you decide when it's time to dist-upgrade. (That's also Ubuntu's policy, and I think the debian-installer has been doing that for quite some time, too.) We'll include a FAQ entry for this. Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Вложения
В списке pgsql-pkg-debian по дате отправления: