Hi,
On 2012-11-16 13:44:45 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> This patch looks OK.
>
> I got 3 comments:
> 1) Why changing the OID of pg_class_tblspc_relfilenode_index from 3171 to
> 3455? It does not look necessary.
Its a mismerge and should have happened in "Add a new RELFILENODE
syscache to fetch a pg_class entry via (reltablespace, relfilenode)" but
it seems I squashed the wrong two commits.
I had originally used 3171 but that since got used up for lo_tell64...
> 2) You should perhaps change the header of RelationMapFilenodeToOid so as
> not mentionning it as the opposite operation of RelationMapOidToFilenode
> but as an operation that looks for the OID of a relation based on its
> relfilenode. Both functions are opposite but independent.
I described it as the opposite because RelationMapOidToFilenode is the
relmappers stated goal and RelationMapFilenodeToOid is just some
side-business.
> 3) Both functions are doing similar operations. Could it be possible
> to wrap them in the same central function?
I don't really see how without making both quite a bit more
complicated. The amount of if's needed seems to be too large to me.
Thanks,
Andres Freund
--Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services