Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Дата
Msg-id 20121112212233.GD12157@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian escribió:

> It is possible that the poor 16k pg_upgrade value is caused by the poor
> 9.2 binary-upgrade number (189.38).  Perhaps I need to hack up
> pg_upgrade to allow a 9.3 to 9.3 upgrade to test this.

Hmm?  This already works, since "make check" uses it, right?

--



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol