Re: Further pg_upgrade analysis for many tables

Bruce Momjian escribió:

> --- 17,24 ----
>
>   static void transfer_single_new_db(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter,
>                          FileNameMap *maps, int size);
> ! static int transfer_relfile(pageCnvCtx *pageConverter, FileNameMap *map,
> !                              const char *suffix);

Uh, does this code assume that forks other than the main one are not
split in segments?  I think that's a bug, is it not?

--