Shigeru HANADA escribió:
> Please examine attached v2 patch (note that is should be applied onto
> latest dblink_fdw_validator patch).
Tom committed parts of the dblink_fdw_validator patch, but not the
removal, so it seems this patch needs to be rebased on top of that
somehow. I am not able to say what's the best resolution for that
conflict, however. But it seems to me that maybe you will need to
choose a different name for the validator after all, to support binary
upgrades.
There are some other comments downthread that a followup patch probably
needs to address too, as well. I am marking this patch Returned with
Feedback. Please submit an updated version to CF3.
Thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services