Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Abhijit Menon-Sen
Тема Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes
Дата
Msg-id 20121018115651.GA1796@toroid.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes
Список pgsql-hackers
At 2012-09-25 01:46:18 +0200, andres@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
>
> The attached patch fixes this issue. Haven't looked at the other one
> in detail yet.

Here are tests for both bugs. They currently fail with HEAD.

Note that the first test now uses PREPARE instead of the SELECTs in the
original example, which no longer works after commit #96cc18 because of
the re-added AcceptInvalidationMessages calls (archaeology by Andres).

-- Abhijit

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deprecations in authentication
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY is not really concurrency safe & leaves around undroppable indexes