Re: how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples delete
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples delete |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201210051736.16460.andres@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples delete (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: how to avoid deadlock on masive update with multiples delete
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Friday, October 05, 2012 05:31:43 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Maciek Sakrejda <m.sakrejda@gmail.com> writes: > > Presumably something like this?: > > maciek=# CREATE TABLE test AS SELECT g, random() FROM > > generate_series(1,1000) g; > > CREATE > > maciek=# EXPLAIN DELETE FROM test USING (SELECT g FROM test ORDER BY > > ctid) x where x.g = test.g; > > There's no guarantee that the planner won't re-sort the rows coming from > the sub-select, unfortunately. More often than not you can prevent the planner from doing that by putting a OFFSET 0 in the query. Not 100% but better than nothing. We really need ORDER BY for DML. Andres -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: