Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry
| От | Noah Misch |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20120926205443.GA27074@tornado.leadboat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_signal_backend() asymmetry
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I'm marking this patch Ready for Committer. I suggest backpatching it to 9.2;
the patch corrects an oversight in 9.2 changes. There's more compatibility
value in backpatching than in retaining distinct behavior for 9.2 only.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:32:41AM -0700, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> ! if (!superuser())
> {
> /*
> ! * Since the user is not superuser, check for matching roles.
> */
> ! if (proc->roleId != GetUserId())
> ! return SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOPERMISSION;
> }
I would have collapsed the conditionals and deleted the obvious comment:
if (!(superuser() || proc->roleId == GetUserId())) return SIGNAL_BACKEND_NOPERMISSION;
The committer can do that if desired; no need for another version.
Thanks,
nm
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: