On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:47:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com> writes:
> > I don't see it as a bug but a limitation. Why do you need such a long
> > password?
>
> Yeah, I think the reason we're not too consistent about this is that
> nobody ever imagined that limits of 100 bytes or more would pose an
> issue in practice. What's the use-case for passwords longer than
> that?
Thanks for all the feedback. I know it is a pain for me to re-ask these
questions, but it allows us to know that these issues have gotten
sufficient thought.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +