Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6
Дата
Msg-id 20120827145251.GI11088@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6  (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:44:32PM +0300, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Where are we on this?
> 
> TL;DR: Got a review, requires substantial work, current github branch
> is slightly broken, will get back to this soon.
> 
> Tom Lane sent a thorough review of the patch here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-03/msg00655.php
> (very much appreciated!)
> 
> I have addressed some smaller points from that list in my github
> branch, but it still requires a substantial amount of work (in
> particular, the bulk of this patch which is the recursion logic in
> eval_const_expressions_mutator, needs to be changed to prevent
> unnecessary CacheExpr insertions and to store intermediate state in
> the context struct).
> 
> I got a small fragment of this into PostgreSQL 9.2 as commit
> 81a646febe87964725647a36d839f6b4b405f3ae. I rebased my github branch
> on top of this commit, but the rebase introduced some test failures
> that I have not tracked down yet. I don't know if it applies to git
> HEAD any more.
> 
> Sadly some other things intervened and I have not had the time to
> return to hacking on this patch. But I am hopeful I can get it into
> shape during the 9.3 cycle.

OK, thanks for the update, and your work on this.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kasahara Tatsuhito
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A caveat of partitioning tables in the document
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?