Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3
Дата
Msg-id 20120616024516.GC26006@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:50:48PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:57:41PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > What about something like this in the root of the tree:
> > find . -name \*.pl -o -name \*.pm | xargs perltidy -b -bl -nsfs -naws -l=100 -ole=unix
> > 
> > There are files all over the place.  The file that would most be
> > affected with one run of this is the ECPG grammar generator.
> > 
> > I checked the "-et=4" business (which is basically entab).  We're pretty
> > inconsistent about tabs in perl code it seems; some files use tabs
> > others use spaces.  Honestly I would just settle on what we use on C
> > files, even if the Perl devs don't recommend it "because of
> > maintainability and portability".  I mean if it works well for us for C
> > code, why would it be a problem in Perl code?  However, I don't write
> > much of that Perl code myself.
> 
> +1 for formatting all our Perl scripts and for including -et=4.  Since that
> will rewrite currently-tidy files anyway, this is a good time to audit our
> perltidy settings.
> 
> Why -l=100 instead of -l=78 like our C code?
> 
> perltidy changes this code:
> 
>     for ($long_variable_name_to_initialize = 0;
>          $long_variable_name_to_initialize < $long_limit_variable_name;
>          $long_variable_name_to_initialize++)
>     {
> 
> to this:
> 
>     for (
>         $long_variable_name_to_initialize = 0;
>         $long_variable_name_to_initialize < $long_limit_variable_name;
>         $long_variable_name_to_initialize++
>       )
>     {
> 
> Using -vtc=2 removes the new trailing line break.  Additionally using "-vt=2
> -nsak=for" removes the new leading line break, but it also removes the space
> between "for" and "(".  Anyone know how to make perltidy format this like we
> do in C code?
> 
> Why -naws?  I would lean toward "-aws -dws -pt=2" to change code like this:
> 
> -my $dbi=DBI->connect('DBI:Pg:dbname='.$opt{d});
> +my $dbi = DBI->connect('DBI:Pg:dbname=' . $opt{d});
> 
> I'd also consider -kbl=2 to preserve runs of blank lines that the author used
> to delineate related groups of functions.

OK, based on this feedback, I have updated the pgindent README to use
these Perl indent instructions:
       find . -name \*.pl -o -name \*.pm | xargs perltidy \       --backup-and-modify-in-place
--opening-brace-on-new-line\       --vertical-tightness=2 --vertical-tightness-closing=2 \
--nospace-after-keyword=for--nospace-for-semicolon \       --add-whitespace --delete-old-whitespace --paren-tightness=2
\      --keep-old-blank-lines=2 --maximum-line-length=78 \       --entab-leading-whitespace=4
--output-line-ending=unix

Unless I hear otherwise, I will run this new command on the 9.2 and HEAD
Perl files.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Janes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Resource Owner reassign Locks
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3