On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:43:23PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 02:32:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I assume 8.3 vacuumdb did not generate these errors. If it was 8.4 I
> > would suggest it was because we don't copy visibility map files from
> > pre-9.1 because those were not crash-safe, but 8.3 didn't have
> > visibility map files (added in PG 8.4), so 8.3 should have been checking
> > the exact same transaction ids as 9.1.
> >
> > Basically, I can't think of a cause.
>
> yeah, neither can we. but - any other test - even using the same source
> of $PGDATA went flawless. I'm tempted to assume it's just a random
> glitch in matrix, and just go on.
Is the vacuumdb still repeatedly failing?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +