> I've applied a modified form of the conname update patch. It seemed to
> me that the fault is really in the DBLINK_GET_CONN and
> DBLINK_GET_NAMED_CONN macros, which ought to be responsible for setting
> the surrounding function's conname variable along with conn, rconn, etc.
> There was actually a second error of the same type visible in the dblink
> regression test, which is also fixed by this more general method.
Come to think of it, the patch is mere a verifying touch for the
bug mingled with the other part of the dblink patch to all
appearances. I totally agree with you. It should be dropped for
this time and done another time.
I'am sorry for bothering you by such a damn thing.
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center