On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 01:46:24PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > I agree with you that some worst case performance tests should be
> > done. Could you please say what you think the worst cases would be, so
> > those can be tested? That would avoid wasting time or getting anything
> > backwards.
>
> I've thought about this some and here's what I've come up with so far:
I question whether we are in a position to do the testing necessary to
commit this for 9.2.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +