Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
| От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20120125224639.GB2651@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:07:40PM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> Finally dawned on me. When you use 'at time zone' on a timestamp
> with tz it strips the tz which then allows the value to be indexed
> because:
>
> -[ RECORD 5 ]-------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Schema | pg_catalog
> Name | date_part
> Result data type | double precision
> Argument data types | text, timestamp without time zone
> Type | normal
> Volatility | immutable
> Owner | postgres
> Language | internal
> Source code | timestamp_part
> Description | extract field from timestamp
yes, but it is not correct - the value is actually stable, and not
immutable.
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: