Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
| От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20120125165750.GA28055@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable? (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Why extract( ... from timestamp ) is not immutable?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:54:44AM -0800, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> > Personally, I think that extract(epoch from timestamp) should assume
> > that the timestamp is UTC.
>
> What if it isn't?
then you can always correct it with "at time zone 'some specific time
zone'"
but you can't correct it the other way.
> > Or that there should be a way to do it - by "it" i mean - extract epoch
> > value from timestamp value in immutable way.
>
> Have a timezone value on the timestamp. If the data you are working with is
> stored as timestamp with time zone then the timestamps represent a point in
> time.
I do have. But you can't have index on epoch from timestamptz.
and while you can have iundex on epoch from timestamp, it is not
correct.
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: