* Simon Riggs (simon@2ndQuadrant.com) wrote:
> I discover that non-all-zeroes holes are fairly common, just not very frequent.
Curious, might be interesting to find out why.
> That may or may not be a problem, but not something to be dealt with
> here and now.
But I agree that it's not the job of this patch/effort. It sounds like
we have clear indication, however, that those areas, as they are not
necessairly all zeros, should be included in the checksum.
Thanks,
Stephen