Re: [snafu] isolation-level change in 2.4.2

On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 2:00:50 pm Daniele Varrazzo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Marko, I've noted just now the "snafu" in the title: do you have
> anything to complain about? Please make an explicit list of your
> points because - but it may be just me not understanding the
> subtleties of the English language - I feel your tone in this thread a
> little bit on the unpleasant side.
>

From what I read Marko was pointing out that the symbolic codes to numeric codes
relationship represents a mapping and that mapping works both ways. To help with
backwards compatibility he was looking to retain the original meaning of the
numeric codes as much as possible. It is a legitimate concern.

>
> -- Daniele,

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com