Re: Command Triggers
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Command Triggers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 201112012157.40912.andres@anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Command Triggers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Command Triggers
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 07:21:25 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Well, I think the main problem is going to be shunting the query down > the right parsing track (SELECT versus utility-statement) early enough. > Making this work cleanly would be a bigger deal than I think you're > thinking. Obviously that depends on the definition of clean... Changing the grammar to make that explicit seems to involve a bit too many changes on a first glance. The cheap way out seems to be to make the decision in analyze.c:transformQuery. Would that be an acceptable way forward? Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: