Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Тема Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Дата
Msg-id 20110930.112443.111535170.horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello,

I understand that it has been at least practically no problem.

Ok, I send this patch to comitters.

Thanks for your dealing with nuisance questions.


At Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:21:32 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote in
<CAHGQGwG0C21F0CZY5ExX-49dxdx7hJuNeiBBJ0Tzvh+7vMXWgw@mail.gmail.com>
> >> > Nevertheless this is ok for all OSs, I don't know whether
> >> > initializing TimestampTz(double, int64 is ok) field with 8 bytes
...
> I believe it's safe. Such a code is placed elsewhere in the source, too.
> If it's unsafe, we should have received lots of bug reports related
> to that. But we've not.

Regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bug of recovery?
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bug of recovery?