Re: Improve lseek scalability v3
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20110919123100.GJ12765@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 (Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Improve lseek scalability v3
Re: Improve lseek scalability v3 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@kvack.org) wrote: > For such tables, can't Postgres track the size of the file internally? I'm > assuming it's keeping file descriptors open on the tables it manages, in > which case when it writes to a file to extend it, the internally stored size > could be updated. Not making a syscall at all would scale far better than > even a modified lseek() will perform. We'd have to have it in shared memory and have a lock around it, it wouldn't be cheap at all. Thanks, Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: