Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От hubert depesz lubaczewski
Тема Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Дата
Msg-id 20110906151253.GA1209@depesz.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Список pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not just the port, it's all the connection parameters ---
> do_connect relies on the PGconn object to remember those, and in this
> case there no longer is a PGconn object.
>
> We could have psql keep that information separately, but I'm not sure
> it's really worth the trouble.

well, I think it's definitely worth the trouble. If I had datbaase
standing at 5432, it would connect to it, and then I could mistakenly
ran commands to wrong database.
this is clearly not a good thing.

depesz

--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
                                                             http://depesz.com/

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #5932: CLUSTER doesn't update n_dead_tup
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail