Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
| От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20110906151253.GA1209@depesz.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail
Re: psql doesn't reuse -p after backend fail |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 02:27:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's not just the port, it's all the connection parameters ---
> do_connect relies on the PGconn object to remember those, and in this
> case there no longer is a PGconn object.
>
> We could have psql keep that information separately, but I'm not sure
> it's really worth the trouble.
well, I think it's definitely worth the trouble. If I had datbaase
standing at 5432, it would connect to it, and then I could mistakenly
ran commands to wrong database.
this is clearly not a good thing.
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: