Re: pgindent messing up "translator: " comments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: pgindent messing up "translator: " comments
Дата
Msg-id 201109051928.p85JSqL11357@momjian.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pgindent messing up "translator: " comments  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I just noticed that this comment got reindented by pgindent
> (xlog.c, line 3226 in REL9_1_STABLE):
>         /*
>          * translator: First %s represents a recovery.conf parameter name like
>          * "recovery_end_command", and the 2nd is the value of that parameter.
>          */
>         ereport((signaled && failOnSignal) ? FATAL : WARNING,
>                 (errmsg("%s \"%s\": return code %d", commandName,
>                         command, rc)));
> 
> Sure enough, the resulting POT entry does not have the necessary
> comment:
> 
> #: /pgsql/source/REL9_1_STABLE/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c:3230
> #, c-format
> msgid "%s \"%s\": return code %d"
> msgstr ""
> 
> I think the proper fix would be to use the /*---- trick, such as in
> postmaster.c:
> 
>         /*------
>           translator: %s is a noun phrase describing a child process, such as
>           "server process" */
>                 (errmsg("%s (PID %d) exited with exit code %d",
>                         procname, pid, WEXITSTATUS(exitstatus))));
> 
> It seems to me that we should alert if pgindent does anything to a
> comment line containing "translator:".

Well, the comment adjustments happen in the C code, which is hard to
modify.  We would need a wrapper that understood when it was in a C
command and add /*--- markers if the word 'translator:' appeared.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: pgindent messing up "translator: " comments
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: memory-related bugs