Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> You seem to have entirely missed the point of Alvaro's remark, which is
> >> that you've got xlog.h including walsender.h (still) as well as
> >> walsender.h including xlog.h. That's broken.
>
> > Oh, OK, done. xlog.h removed from walsender.h and tested.
>
> I would have gone the other way on that one, if possible. Seems like
> xlog.h ought to be the lower-level file.
Agreed. Let me work on that.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +