Re: Why schema of table is removed from explain?
| От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Why schema of table is removed from explain? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20110901204251.GA23649@depesz.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Why schema of table is removed from explain? (hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:39:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:24:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> The non-plain-text output formats provide that sort of detail, if you
> >> need it.
>
> > Which is great, but why can't we have it in plain text too?
>
> It's frequently unnecessary, and horizontal space is precious in the
> plain-text format.
Well, I understand that adding "public." usually wouldn't be any good,
but what about representing the table name as oid::regclass does? i.e.
adds schema only if table is in schema that is not in search_path?
Best regards,
depesz
--
The best thing about modern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.
http://depesz.com/
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: