Robert Haas wrote:
> Works for me. Just to confirm, that means we'd also change GEQO to
> use pg_erand48().
>
> > BTW, as far as the original plan of using random_r is concerned, how
> > did you manage to not run into this?
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3662
> > I just wasted half an hour on that stupidity in an unrelated context...
>
> Good grief. It's hard to imagine a more user-hostile attitude than
> the one taken there. I did run into that precise issue, but managed
Yes, it is scary to think people are relying on software written by
people which such a poor attitude toward quality.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +